Maria Kalyakina vs Anna Yang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Maria Kalyakina's second serve points won in the last 6 months stands at 37.07%, compared to Anna Yang's 41.55%. This suggests Yang has a slight edge in their recent second serve performance.
• When it comes to returning games, Kalyakina has won 54.74% of opponents' second serve points, outpacing Yang who stands at 47.30%. In the first serve return, Kalyakina again leads with 37.38% over Yang’s 34.30%.
• In high-pressure situations, Kalyakina has saved 43.27% of breakpoints in the last 6 months, while Yang has a superior breakpoint saving rate of 55.77%. Could this be the decisive factor?
• Both players have similar match win percentages over the last year, with Kalyakina at 52.54% and Yang close behind at 52.17%.
• Analyzing their performance on different surfaces, Kalyakina excels on hard courts with a 56% win rate, whereas Yang's forte appears to be indoor hard courts, also at 56%.
• Considering their participation in $10K level tournaments, Yang has a marginally higher win percentage at 57.89% compared to Kalyakina’s 53.49%.
• In their lone head-to-head match, Kalyakina emerged victorious after a competitive three-set encounter.
• Kalyakina has taken on opponents with an average rank of 390.36, in contrast to Yang, who has faced stronger competition with an average rank of 203.48.
• In the deciding set scenarios over the past year, Kalyakina has won 52% of matches, prominently outperforming Yang’s 22% win rate.

Editorial Prediction (October 13, 2025, UTC):

In evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of both Maria Kalyakina and Anna Yang, several factors come into play. Kalyakina demonstrates superiority in return games, especially against the opponent's second serve, which might give her a significant advantage in breaking Yang's service games.

On the other hand, Yang’s more effective second serve and higher breakpoint save percentage under pressure could allow her to maintain service leads. Furthermore, Yang's recent competition against stronger opponents suggests heightened competitive preparedness.

While Kalyakina's proven ability to secure deciding sets is a noteworthy advantage, especially in probable high-tension situations, we also consider Yang’s prowess in playing on tougher circuits.

After balancing these factors, the prediction tilts towards Maria Kalyakina due to her superior return game capabilities and clutch performance in deciding sets. Nonetheless, it remains a closely contested encounter.